This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Sep. 25, 2012

Injunction bars city from seizing poor folks property

Long story short, the 9th Circuit is not always opposed to private property rights. It evidently depends on whose property and how politically correct its owners are.

Gideon Kanner

Professor of Law Emeritus, Loyola Law School

USC Law School

It isn't every day that your faithful servant finds himself in basic agreement with Dean Erwin Chemerinsky who can usually be found on the other side of the ideological spectrum, but whose recent column ("Constitution protects the homeless too," Sept. 18) in this newspaper takes up cudgels for - are you ready? - private property rights, even if those are just the politically correct property rights of the homeless denizens of skid row. Make no mistake, I am with Dean Chemerinski on that...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails