Zoning, Planning and Use
Aug. 21, 2000
Interim Inconvenience
By Daniel J. Curtin. Ninth Circuit holds that temporary development moratorium is not an unconstitutional taking.
By Daniel J. Curtin
In the recent 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. ECR Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6356 (June 16, 2000) (9th Cir. June 15, 2000), the court held that a temporary development moratorium did not deprive owners ...
In the recent 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. ECR Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6356 (June 16, 2000) (9th Cir. June 15, 2000), the court held that a temporary development moratorium did not deprive owners ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In