U.S. Supreme Court,
Securities,
Civil Litigation,
Corporate,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jun. 22, 2018
SEC in-house judges ruling is the agency's latest in a string of losses
The Supreme Court has now disagreed with the SEC's interpretation of the Constitution and federal law in a series of significant cases.
Thomas A. Zaccaro
Senior Counsel
Hueston Hennigan LLP
Phone: (213) 788-4039
Email: tzaccaro@hueston.com
Boston College Law School
Thomas is a partner in the firm's Litigation Department. He served as regional trial counsel in the SEC's Los Angeles office.
Nicolas Morgan
Partner
Paul Hastings LLP
Phone: (213) 683-6181
Email: nicolasmorgan@paulhastings.com
Nicolas is a partner in the firm's Litigation Department. He served as senior trial counsel in the SEC's Los Angeles office.
Kyle Jones
Associate
Paul Hastings LLP
515 S Flower St Fl 25
Los Angeles , California 90071
Phone: (213) 683-6189
Email: kylejones@paulhastings.com
Kyle is an associate in the firm's Litigation Department
OCTOBER 2017 TERM
In June 2014, after a string of high-profile jury trial losses in insider trading cases, then-Director of Enforcement Andrew Ceresney announced a tactical retreat into the friendly confines of administrative hearings before the Securities and Exchange Commission's administrative law judges. The implications of this decision were lost on no one and were promptly criticized by the securities defense bar, federal judges, and eve...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In