This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 30, 2019

The debate over Dynamex’s retroactivity heads to the California Supreme Court

The law does not favor retroactivity; but how the court will rule is unclear.

Felix Shafir

Partner
Horvitz & Levy LLP

Appellate Law

Email: fshafir@horvitzlevy.com

Felix's practice focuses on the defense of class and representative actions.

Jacob M. McIntosh

Appellate Fellow
Horvitz & Levy LLP

Jacob is part of Horvitz & Levy LLP's Appellate Fellowship Program and participates in a variety of projects including the drafting of briefs in the 9th Circuit, performing case-related legal research, and developing articles for publication.

For decades, California courts and employers distinguished between independent contractors and employees using a flexible, multi-factor test articulated by the California Supreme Court in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 769 P.2d 399 (Cal. 1989). Last year, however, in Dynamex Operations ...