Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Feb. 18, 2020
California's relentless effort to expand contractor 'misclassification' laws to joint employment and franchising
The debate over the Supreme Court of California's 2018 Dynamex decision - in which the state's highest court adopted the so-called "ABC test" for determining whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor or as an employee - and the California legislature's subsequent codification of Dynamex via AB 5, has dominated the legal landscape of California employment law.
Michael J. Lotito
Shareholder
Littler Mendelson PC
Michael is co-chair of Littler Mendelson PC's Workplace Policy Institute in San Francisco and Washington, advises clients and policymakers in all aspects of traditional labor relations, including matters arising under the National Labor Relations Act.
James A. Paretti
Shareholder
Littler Mendelson PC
Email: jparetti@littler
James is a shareholder in Littler's Washington office who provides in-depth political and policy counsel to clients on matters including labor and employment law, regulations and legislation.
The debate over the California Supreme Court's 2018 Dynamex decision -- in which the state's highest court adopted the so-called "ABC test" for determining whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor or as an employee -- and the California Legislature's subsequent codification of Dynamex via Assembly Bill 5, has dominated the legal landscape of California employment law. $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In