This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Civil Litigation

Apr. 6, 2020

The use of hearsay during restraining order hearings

California has enacted a number of laws to curb violence at home, in the workplace, schools and elsewhere. These laws provide different procedures and standards.

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Dean Hansell

Judge
Los Angeles Court Superior Court

Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, 1977

Pomona Courthouse South

Bryant Y. Yang

Judge
Los Angeles County Superior Court

UC Berkeley School of Law

California has enacted a number of laws to curb violence at home, in the workplace, schools and elsewhere. These laws provide different procedures and standards. This article analyzes whether hearsay evidence is admissible under the Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHRO) law, the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA), the Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO) law, and the Workplace Violence Safety Act (WVSA).

The CHRO law permi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up