U.S. Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment,
Civil Rights
Jul. 2, 2020
The Juxtaposition Turn: disparate treatment and disparate intent
In his majority opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Justice Gorsuch provided a helpful explanation of intent in employment discrimination cases.
Tristin Green
Professor
University of San Francisco Law School
In his majority opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 2020 DJDAR 5681, holding that an employer that fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender violates Title VII, Justice Neil Gorsuch mentions that "in so-called 'disparate treatment' cases ... , this Court has ... held that the difference in treatment based on sex must be intentional," citi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In