This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Intellectual Property,
Civil Litigation

Oct. 27, 2020

Justices to weigh validity of administrative patent judge hiring

This month, the U.S. Supreme Court granted three petitions seeking review of a Federal Circuit decision holding that all administrative patent judges hired by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office were unconstitutionally appointed.

Ben M. Davidson

Founder
Davidson Law Group ALC

Intellectual Property

Phone: (310) 473-2300

Email: Ben@dlgla.com

George Washington Univ Law School

Ben is a former patent examiner and represents corporations in intellectual property litigation and proceedings before the U. S. Patent & Trademark Office.

On Oct. 13, the U.S. Supreme Court granted three petitions seeking review of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's 2019 decision in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320. Arthrex held that all administrative patent judges -- AP...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up