For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Ben M. Davidson

See more on Ben M. Davidson

Founder
Intellectual Property
Davidson Law Group ALC

Calabasas , CA

Phone: (310) 473-2300
Email: Ben@dlgla.com

Ben is the founder of the Davidson Law Group. He is a former patent examiner and represents corporations in intellectual property litigation and proceedings before the U. S. Patent & Trademark Office.

George Washington Univ Law School



Columns
Title Category Published
High court authorizes PTO director to review PTAB decisions U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Jul. 1, 2021
Justices to weigh validity of administrative patent judge hiring U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation Oct. 27, 2020
Ruling limited review of PTAB decisions to institute inter partes reviews U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 11, 2020
Are Patent Office attorney fees awardable under Section 145? U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 8, 2019
Federal Circuit gives patent venue win to defendants U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property May 17, 2018
Justices to consider lost profits, extraterritoriality U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, International Law, Intellectual Property, Corporate Jan. 17, 2018
Inter Partes Reviewed U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 1, 2017
CFPB's Constitutionality; EDTX Patent Monopoly No More Intellectual Property, Government, Constitutional Law, Appellate Practice, Administrative/Regulatory May 26, 2017
Ruling will dramatically change how patent cases are litigated U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 25, 2017
Ruling will dramatically change how patent cases are litigated U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property May 23, 2017
Decision will hurt patent defendants U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 28, 2017
Important patent exhaustion issues at high court U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 14, 2016
Lee v. Tam: a closer look U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Oct. 19, 2016
Design patents return to the Supreme Court in Samsung v. Apple U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Oct. 7, 2016
Could the Apple-Samsung fight unleash a new wave of patent trolls? U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 26, 2016
Patent challenge standard: PTAB versus district court Intellectual Property Jan. 21, 2016
Offensive marks are now protected Intellectual Property Dec. 31, 2015
When can courts enhance patent damages? Perspective Oct. 24, 2015
Laches live on in patent context despite high court ruling U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Sep. 26, 2015
Patent laws... you know, like sausages Administrative/Regulatory Jun. 30, 2015
Defense won't fly in patent scuffles U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 28, 2015
Justices curious about the building blocks of software U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Jan. 21, 2015
Bizarre petition serves as reminder U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 20, 2014
Can 'good faith' excuse induced patent infringment? Intellectual Property Dec. 16, 2014
The death of Internet patents U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Nov. 21, 2014
Bankruptcy lawyers defend fees on their own dime? Bankruptcy Oct. 10, 2014

Verdicts & Settlements
Case Name Topic Role Published
DMF Inc. v. AMP Plus Inc. dba Elco Lighting, Elco Lighting Inc. Intellectual Property Plaintiff Apr. 4, 2025
Carve Designs Inc. v. Australian Apparel Pty. Ltd., Carve USA Inc., Versatraction Inc. dba VGT Sports Intellectual Property Plaintiff Dec. 3, 2016
Spin Master, Ltd., et al. v. Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC et al. Intellectual Property Plaintiff Dec. 8, 2012
Title Category Published
High court authorizes PTO director to review PTAB decisions U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Jul. 1, 2021
Justices to weigh validity of administrative patent judge hiring U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation Oct. 27, 2020
Ruling limited review of PTAB decisions to institute inter partes reviews U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 11, 2020
Are Patent Office attorney fees awardable under Section 145? U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 8, 2019
Federal Circuit gives patent venue win to defendants U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property May 17, 2018
Justices to consider lost profits, extraterritoriality U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, International Law, Intellectual Property, Corporate Jan. 17, 2018
Inter Partes Reviewed U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 1, 2017
CFPB's Constitutionality; EDTX Patent Monopoly No More Intellectual Property, Government, Constitutional Law, Appellate Practice, Administrative/Regulatory May 26, 2017
Ruling will dramatically change how patent cases are litigated U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 25, 2017
Ruling will dramatically change how patent cases are litigated U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property May 23, 2017
Decision will hurt patent defendants U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 28, 2017
Important patent exhaustion issues at high court U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 14, 2016
Lee v. Tam: a closer look U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Oct. 19, 2016
Design patents return to the Supreme Court in Samsung v. Apple U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Oct. 7, 2016
Could the Apple-Samsung fight unleash a new wave of patent trolls? U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Mar. 26, 2016
Patent challenge standard: PTAB versus district court Intellectual Property Jan. 21, 2016
Offensive marks are now protected Intellectual Property Dec. 31, 2015
When can courts enhance patent damages? Perspective Oct. 24, 2015
Laches live on in patent context despite high court ruling U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Sep. 26, 2015
Patent laws... you know, like sausages Administrative/Regulatory Jun. 30, 2015
Defense won't fly in patent scuffles U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 28, 2015
Justices curious about the building blocks of software U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Jan. 21, 2015
Bizarre petition serves as reminder U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Dec. 20, 2014
Can 'good faith' excuse induced patent infringment? Intellectual Property Dec. 16, 2014
The death of Internet patents U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property Nov. 21, 2014
Bankruptcy lawyers defend fees on their own dime? Bankruptcy Oct. 10, 2014
Case Name Topic Role Published
DMF Inc. v. AMP Plus Inc. dba Elco Lighting, Elco Lighting Inc. Intellectual Property Plaintiff Apr. 4, 2025
Carve Designs Inc. v. Australian Apparel Pty. Ltd., Carve USA Inc., Versatraction Inc. dba VGT Sports Intellectual Property Plaintiff Dec. 3, 2016
Spin Master, Ltd., et al. v. Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC et al. Intellectual Property Plaintiff Dec. 8, 2012
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.