This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Government,
Administrative/Regulatory

Jan. 4, 2021

The hurried effort to repeal Section 230 is ill-advised

Although passed in response to the digital revolution, Section 230’s protections are far from novel.

Daniel B. Lifschitz

Partner
Johnson & Johnson LLP

Email: dlifschitz@jjllplaw.com

Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA

Moliere famously said that unreasonable haste is the direct road to error. The current quixotic fixation in Washington, D.C. on repealing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act largely fueled by a fundamental misunderstanding of the law's function, encapsulates the danger of such haste, as it risks upending the foundational architecture of the internet in service of little more than shortsighted political score-settling.

Fo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up