This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Daniel B. Lifschitz

See more on Daniel B. Lifschitz

Partner
Johnson & Johnson LLP

Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA



Columns
Title Category Published
How to navigate the complexities of non-disparagement clauses Litigation & Arbitration Dec. 12, 2023
California courts continue to circumscribe anti-SLAPP motions Year in Review Column, Civil Litigation Dec. 7, 2023
Generative AI must account for artists’ rights of publicity Technology, Intellectual Property Oct. 30, 2023
Supreme Court rules against fair use of Andy Warhol silkscreen U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 23, 2023
Florida sides with California on delayed discovery in copyright cases Intellectual Property, Ediscovery Mar. 3, 2023
When dogs catch cars: The conservative undoing of stare decisis U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary, Ethics/Professional Responsibility May 16, 2022
3 more music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Sep. 17, 2021
3 music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Sep. 16, 2021
Black Windows: Scarlett Jo vs Disney Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Aug. 6, 2021
The hurried effort to repeal Section 230 is ill-advised Government, Administrative/Regulatory Jan. 4, 2021
Plaintiffs in pre-1972 recording cases scored a big win Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 29, 2018
The 9th Circuit: Hollywood's circuit Entertainment & Sports Mar. 1, 2016
RESPECT Act doesn't deserve any respect Intellectual Property Jun. 10, 2014

Verdicts & Settlements

MCLE
Title Category Published
3 more music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property Sep. 17, 2021
3 music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property Sep. 16, 2021
Title Category Published
How to navigate the complexities of non-disparagement clauses Litigation & Arbitration Dec. 12, 2023
California courts continue to circumscribe anti-SLAPP motions Year in Review Column, Civil Litigation Dec. 7, 2023
Generative AI must account for artists’ rights of publicity Technology, Intellectual Property Oct. 30, 2023
Supreme Court rules against fair use of Andy Warhol silkscreen U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property May 23, 2023
Florida sides with California on delayed discovery in copyright cases Intellectual Property, Ediscovery Mar. 3, 2023
When dogs catch cars: The conservative undoing of stare decisis U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary, Ethics/Professional Responsibility May 16, 2022
3 more music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Sep. 17, 2021
3 music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Sep. 16, 2021
Black Windows: Scarlett Jo vs Disney Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation Aug. 6, 2021
The hurried effort to repeal Section 230 is ill-advised Government, Administrative/Regulatory Jan. 4, 2021
Plaintiffs in pre-1972 recording cases scored a big win Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 29, 2018
The 9th Circuit: Hollywood's circuit Entertainment & Sports Mar. 1, 2016
RESPECT Act doesn't deserve any respect Intellectual Property Jun. 10, 2014
Title Category Published
3 more music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property Sep. 17, 2021
3 music litigation developments in 2020-2021 Intellectual Property Sep. 16, 2021