Government,
Civil Rights
Apr. 27, 2021
Skid Row ruling should be required reading
Judge David O. Carter wrote, “Virtually every citizen of Los Angeles has borne the impacts of the City and County’s continued failure to meaningfully confront the crisis of homelessness.”
Timothy D. Reuben
Founder and CEO
Reuben, Raucher & Blum
Phone: (310) 777-1990
Email: treuben@rrbattorneys.com
Reuben is the founder and CEO at Reuben Raucher & Blum. Alongside his extensive career as a civil litigator specializing in complex matters at both the trial and appellate level, he serves pro bono as a temporary judge and settlement officer for the Los Angeles Superior Court, as well as a fee arbitrator for the LA County Bar.
"Virtually every citizen of Los Angeles has borne the impacts of the City and County's continued failure to meaningfully confront the crisis of homelessness."
This powerful indictment of past and current elected officials in Los Angeles is documented in the 109-page opinion and order of District Judge David O. Carter in his April 20 mandatory injunction ruling in
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Judges and Judiciary, Government, Civil Rights
US judge won’t stay orders to house all homeless in LA County in 6 months
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
LA County asks 9th Circuit for stay of homelessness injunction
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation
Freeway housing injunction could be reinstated in LA homeless case
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
LA County says US judge’s order not based on facts
By Gina Kim
Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation
County: homeless case lacks Article III case in controversy
By Gina Kim
