This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Jul. 22, 2021

Most state judges oppose informal bias committees

The support among judges for eliminating the recommendation clashes with the views of some attorneys, who say there should be a process for addressing behavior by judges that might not warrant a formal complaint with a presiding judge or the Commission on Judicial Performance.

Judges who submitted comments to a Judicial Council work group, including presiding judges from large, medium, and small counties, almost uniformly support eliminating a decades old recommendation that each court establish an informal system for receiving and reviewing complaints.

"It is my belief that the informal complaint process is unnecessary," wrote Sacramento County Superior Court Presiding Judge $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up