Civil Litigation,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Sep. 23, 2021
Most tuna eaters weren’t harmed by conspiracy, lawyers say
Gregory G. Garre, a partner with Latham & Watkins LLP who represents StarKist Co., said about 28% of the class suffered no damages as a result of the alleged antitrust violations.




An attorney for producers of packaged tuna told a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals en banc panel Wednesday that class certification should be rejected because too many of the plaintiffs suffered no harm.
Gregory G. Garre, a partner with Latham & Watkins LLP who represents StarKist Co., said about 28% of the class suffered no damages as a result of the alleged antitrust violations.
"A large number of class me...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In