Judges and Judiciary
Oct. 17, 2022
On Unanimous Opinions
Suppose one of the signing Justices did have qualms, but swallowed them in order to accommodate a Chief who seeks "greater force." Doesn't the public have the right to the whole truth: that a signing Justice in fact had reservations about what he or she was signing on to?
Myron Moskovitz
Legal Director
Moskovitz Appellate Team
90 Crocker Ave
Piedmont , CA 94611-3823
Phone: (510) 384-0354
Email: myronmoskovitz@gmail.com
UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hal
My learned friend Jon Eisenberg recently graced these pages with a piece about the increase in unanimous opinions from our California Supreme Court.
A digression. "My learned friend" is an affectation employed by British barristers to describe their opposing counsel. (It's pronounced "ler-ned" - two syllables, with accent on the first syllable - not "lernd".) When I argued a case before the California Supreme Court a couple of years...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In