This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Expert Advice,
Ediscovery

May 15, 2023

A comprehensive guide to selecting and preparing an effective Rule 30(b)(6) witness for e-discovery

Preparation is crucial for a Person Most Knowledgeable witness handling e-discovery matters, as their testimony will represent the company and likely impact the case’s substantive issues.

Daniel B. Garrie

Neutral
JAMS

Cyber Security

Orange County

Cell: (212) 826-5351

Email: daniel@lawandforensics.com

See more...

Thomas I. Vanaskie

Circuit Judge

See more...

GUEST COLUMN

In recent years, litigants increasingly have sought information about electronic data and systems through depositions, using the Federal Rule 30(b)(6) deposition or, similarly, the Person Most Knowledgeable (PMK) deposition in California practice. Further, both federal and state courts have imposed strict requirements for parties to identify, preserve, and produce electronic documents. This article offers general ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up