This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Sep. 12, 2023

Panel leery of remanding Tinder case to LA federal judge

Two of the three 9th Circuit panelists expressed doubt about whether the district court judge approvingly quoted the dissenting judge on a different panel instead of the majority.

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel was skeptical Monday of a revised settlement of a class action between a plaintiff and the owner of the Tinder dating app, wondering aloud if a district court judge in Los Angeles should be removed from the case.

A different appellate panel rejected an earlier agreement between plaintiff Lisa Kim and Match Group LLC, owner of Tinder, and objectors to that earlier deal oppose the revised one too.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up