This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Technology

Nov. 7, 2025

Why AI hallucinations prove the legal system works

AI hallucinations reveal the resilience and limits of our adversarial process. Institutional skepticism eventually catches fake cases, but only when lawyers do their professional duties.

James Mixon

Managing Attorney
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District

See more...

Why AI hallucinations prove the legal system works
Shutterstock

Two years after Mata v. Avianca, lawyers are still citing fabricated cases. Georgia attorney Diana Lynch: 13 fake cases across two briefs. California attorney Amir Mostafavi: 21 fabricated quotes. Federal judges in New Jersey and Mississippi: orders containing AI-generated errors.

Every fabrication was eventually caught. But not before clients paid for appeals based on fiction, judges verified nonexistent authority, and courts ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up