This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Mar. 4, 2026

Recalibrating equitable jurisdiction in federal court: The 9th Circuit's post-Sonner landscape

Recent 9th Circuit decisions are reshaping how federal courts handle equitable claims in California consumer class actions, creating new strategic choices--and tradeoffs--for defendants deciding whether to remain in federal court.

Bryan Weintrop

Partner
Venable LLP

See more...

Adel Kelifa

Associate
Venable LLP

See more...

Recalibrating equitable jurisdiction in federal court: The 9th Circuit's post-<i>Sonner </i>landscape
Shutterstock

Recent 9th Circuit decisions have clarified the procedural landscape with respect to jurisdictional issues impacting California consumer class actions.  Specifically, these recent decisions have clarified how federal courts may exercise jurisdiction over claims seeking equitable relief in the wake of the 9th Circuit's 2020 decision in Sonner v. Premier Nut...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up