Technology,
Securities,
Business Law
Dec. 11, 2024
2025 reporting season hot topics: insiders, AI and cybersecurity
As the 2025 reporting season approaches, public companies must carefully review SEC rule changes on insider trading, equity grants, and emerging issues like AI and cybersecurity to ensure compliance with new disclosure requirements and to avoid potential enforcement actions.
Sara L. Terheggen
Founder and Managing Director The NBD Group, Inc.
UC Berkeley Boalt Hall
The NBD Group, Inc., a leading legal and business solutions firm. Dr. T has advised on transactions with an aggregate value of more than $110 billion, including more than 20 IPOs, and she has been recognized close to 50 times for her professional expertise and leadership.
Public companies have many things to consider as the 2025 reporting season kicks off. Certain 2024 rule changes made by the SEC and SEC enforcement actions in 2024 will require a careful review of disclosure on a number of key fronts and requirements for the upcoming year are focused on insiders and material non-public information, as well as AI and cybersecurity disclosures. To be prepared, companies can start updating their proxy checklists and building in time to address certain disclosure requirements. These key hot topic items can be grouped into Insiders and Cutting-Edge Trends. Taking these into consideration now as companies are building out their 2025 reporting checklists will give companies a head start, and ensure a smoother reporting season as well as better compliance with new rules and requirements.
Insiders: a focus on material non-public information
Insider trading
policies and disclosure
The SEC's changes to Rule 10b5-1 have already largely taken effect. Insiders are now required to satisfy four conditions in order to rely on the affirmative defense provided by Rule 10b5-1(c). These include:
· Cooling-off period between the time plan
is adopted and the time that trades under the plan start, duration being the
longer of 90 days following the adoption of a 10b5-1 trading plan or two business
days following a Company's disclosure of financial results on 10-Q or 10-K,
subject to a maximum cooling-off period of 120 days;
· Certification that requires any officer
or director adopting a 10b5-1 plan to certify they are not in possession of
material non-public information (MNPI) and is adopting the plan in good faith;
· Limits on multiple and overlapping
10b5-1 plans that are subject to a handful of very limited exceptions; and
· Limits on a person having no more than
one single-trade 10b5-1 trading plan in any 12-month period.
These changes resulted in disclosures changes pursuant to amended
Item 402(x), which now requires quarterly disclosure of the adoption or
termination of any 10b5-1 plan.
Building on these 10b5-1 updates, the new Item 408(b) of
Regulation S-K requires companies to disclose annually whether insider trading
policies and procedures have been adopted and a description of these policies
and procedures. Any company that has not adopted such insider trading policies
and procedures will be required to disclose reasons for not doing so. In
addition to the disclosure, companies will be required to include their insider
trading policies and procedures as an exhibit to their annual report. These
requirements will take effect in connection with the filing of 2024 10-Ks (or
20-F for foreign private issuers).
Due to the upcoming requirements for insider trading policies,
this is a great time for companies to assess the status of their current
policies (or to the extent they do not have one, implementing one). Updates
should be made to ensure recent SEC enforcement actions are addressed as well
as current trends given recent rule changes around 10b5-1. This would involve
asking legal counsel to review the company's existing policy and comparing it
to those companies that have already complied with this rule change. This will
ensure a company will be ready to meet this requirement at the time of
filing.
Equity grant disclosures
Another area being impacted by the SEC's increased focus on MNPI
is disclosure around a company's policies and practices regarding the timing of
awards of stock options, SARs and similar option-like instruments (together,
stock instruments), including providing disclosure around the timing for such
grants as determined by the board. The SEC has become increasingly focused on
the timing of grants of equity awards to executives that could be problematic
when considering the timing of a company's release of MNPI. Beginning in a company's
2024 10-K or Proxy, a company must provide narrative disclosure on this and
must disclose whether the board (or compensation committee) takes MNPI into
account when determining the awards, including whether the company has timed
the disclosure of MNPI with such an equity grant.
Additional tabular disclosure is required if, during the last
fiscal year, these stock instruments were awarded to a named executive officer
(NEO) within four business days before filing of a form 10-K or 10-Q or the
filing or furnishing of a Form 8-K that discloses MNPI and ending one business
day after any such filing. If such stock instruments were awarded, new Item
402(x) requires disclosure of:
· Name of NEO;
· Grant date of award;
· Number of securities underlying the award;
· Per-share exercise price;
· Grant date fair value of the award;
· % change in the market price of the
underlying securities between the closing price one trading day prior to and
one trading immediately following disclosure of MNPI.
As a practical matter, while these equity grant disclosures are
new, fundamental principles around the granting of equity awards have not
changed. Companies should ensure all equity awards are granted only during open
trading windows and when the company otherwise has no MNPI. In addition,
companies should be mindful that any granting of option awards should not occur
during the four business day window leading up to the
filing of a 10-Q or 10-K or during the one business day after such filing.
Cutting-edge trends: AI and cybersecurity
AI and cybersecurity have
become the new cutting-edge trends forcing the SEC to make rule changes and
adjust to an ever-shifting landscape of technological advancement. Last year,
the SEC introduced several new cybersecurity disclosure requirements, which
companies have already implemented, but 2025 offers an opportunity for further
review and refinement. The SEC has already noted areas of improvement,
including that companies should watch for inconsistent statements around third
parties used to support, manage or supplement cybersecurity processes and
inadequate disclosure regarding the relevant expertise as is necessary to fully
describe the nature of the expertise. In addition to companies reviewing
previously provided cybersecurity disclosures to ensure consistency and
compliance with practice, companies should be reviewing and updating risk
factors to ensure adequate disclosures are being made - especially in light of recent SEC enforcement actions alleging
deficiencies in company disclosure.
Another cutting-edge trend the SEC is prioritizing for 2025
disclosure is artificial intelligence. While no wide-sweeping regulation
changes have been proposed, the SEC has adopted rules specific to broker
dealers and investment firms and has brought enforcement actions against
financial institutions. In addition, the SEC has been focused on tempering
disclosures about AI, and has suggested companies focus on the following in
connection with 2025 reporting:
· Specifically defining what AI means for
the company in concrete terms specific to a company's technology and avoiding
overhyped statements that do not have adequate support;
· Providing material risks and impacts
specific to the company as opposed to boilerplate commentary that could apply
to any company; and
· Ensuring companies have a reasonable
basis for any claims made about AI.
Because of its proliferation, AI has quickly become a focus for
many companies and, in light of AI being an SEC
disclosure priority, companies would be advised to review their disclosures in
light of the above SEC recommendations and make necessary changes to temper
such statements. This is especially important in light of
recent SEC enforcement settlements that were focused on companies providing
support for claims made to avoid the SEC classifying such statements as
"unsupported hype."
Planning ahead
Reporting seasons are always a challenging time for companies but
proper planning that is purpose-driven can go a long way to improving a
company's disclosure especially in light of rule
changes or adjustments a company may need to make to such disclosure.
Discussing these items early can ensure finance teams and others can modify
disclosure as necessary and ensure filings are compliant with all recent rule
changes.
Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com