For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Washington
Parolee was still eligible for resentencing under section 1172.75 because he had been in custody serving a term that included a legally invalid enhancement when identified as eligible for relief. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Jan. 15, 2026
Modification: In re Thai
Limiting types of prison conduct credits available to advance youth parole eligibility date while allowing non-youthful offenders to utilize other types of credits did not violate equal protection. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 15, 2026
Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Admin. Services
Regardless of whether the underlying employment relationship involved interstate commerce, trial court properly dismissed class claims where employment arbitration agreement expressly consented to Federal Arbitration Act governance. 		Arbitration 2DCA/8 Jan. 15, 2026
Barrett v. U.S.
Congress did not clearly authorize convictions under both sections 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j)(1) for a single act that violates both provisions; one act violating both sections may yield only one conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Case v. Montana
The test for an emergency aid warrantless entry into a home is whether officers have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury. 		Constitutional Law USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections
Candidate for office had standing to challenge Illinois law requiring counting of mail-in ballots postmarked or certified by, but received after, election day. 		Civil Procedure USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Friends of Animals v. Burgum
Bureau of Land Management did not act improperly by approving contract for a new off-range corral to hold wild horses and burros in accordance with its standards. 		Animal Law, Environmental Law 9th Jan. 15, 2026
Modification: People v. Jimenez
Defendant was erroneously sentenced under the general vandalism statute, where a more specific, relevant statute concerning vandalism of jail property applied. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Jan. 14, 2026
Howard v. Republican National Committee
Telephone Consumer Protection Act did not prohibit the sending of text messages containing a video file that required the user to press play to view the file. 		Consumer Law 9th Jan. 14, 2026
U.S. v. Gomez
Unpreserved claims on appeal are reviewed only for plain error and because district court's error classifying assault with a deadly weapon as a crime of violence was not plain, the sentence was affirmed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jan. 14, 2026
Malheur Forest Fairness Coal v. Iron Triangle, LLC
Plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead that defendant timber company had a monopoly in harvest rights and other related markets for contracts with the U.S. Forest Service. 		Antitrust 9th Jan. 14, 2026
Chong v. Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Law firm was entitled to its full contingency fee where client voluntarily ratified an allegedly unauthorized settlement by subsequently agreeing to and accepting its benefits. 		Attorneys 2DCA/5 Jan. 12, 2026
State of Oregon v. Trump
Order 		9th Jan. 12, 2026
Barbanell v. Lodge
Because trial court's judgment granting the petition to appoint an arbitrator terminated a discrete action on the contract, respondents were entitled to attorneys' fees notwithstanding ongoing disputes elsewhere. 		Fees and Costs, Arbitration 4DCA/1 Jan. 12, 2026
Healy v. Milliman Inc.
To establish standing for unnamed class members at summary judgment, plaintiffs may rely on circumstantial evidence and need only show a triable issue of fact, not definitive proof of injury. 		Civil Procedure, Consumer Law 9th Jan. 12, 2026
Bowe v. U.S.
28 U.S.C. section 2244 does not bar certiorari petitions by federal prisoners, nor require that previously presented claims be dismissed. 		Habeas Corpus, Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jan. 12, 2026
In re Gilsvik
Bankruptcy court's decision to reduce debtor's attorney's fees by over $3,000 was not clearly erroneous based on the services rendered and the minimal complexity of the case. 		Fees and Costs, Bankruptcy BAP Jan. 13, 2026
AliveCor, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Apple's refusal to share data from older algorithm after it was replaced with a newer, improved version did not constitute unlawful monopolization. 		Antitrust 9th Jan. 9, 2026
People v. Cagle
Defendant's due process claim was forfeited when he failed to raise concerns regarding expert opinions' reliability during trial. 		Evidence, Constitutional Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 9, 2026
Gonzalez v. City of Phoenix
Officers who used force that was counter to their training and continued the force after suspect was restrained, which resulted in death, were not entitled to qualified immunity. 		Qualified Immunity 9th Jan. 9, 2026
Seagate Technology LLC v. NHK Spring Co. Ltd.
District court erroneously granted summary judgment in antitrust claim based on foreign commercial price-fixing, where domestic effects of the anti-competitive conduct may have rendered U.S. antritrust law applicable. 		Antitrust 9th Jan. 9, 2026
U.S. v. Soto
Order 		9th Jan. 9, 2026
Ruffier v. Volcano Hills Road Maintenance Assn.
Despite trial court's conclusion that homeowners association's $200 annual assessment cap was unreasonable, association's failure to follow statutory requirements to increase assessment rendered the increase illegal. 		Real Property 3DCA Jan. 8, 2026
Spilman v. The Salvation Army
Court of Appeal devised a two-part test to distinguish between employees and volunteers of non-profit organizations. 		Employment Law 1DCA/5 Jan. 8, 2026
U.S. v. Ruiz
District court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of defendant's prior conviction where it satisfied each prong for admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). 		Evidence 9th Jan. 8, 2026
Mendocino Railway v. Meyer
Trial court erred in finding that Mendocino Railway was not a common carrier public utility, entitled to eminent domain. 		Eminent Domain 1DCA/1 Jan. 8, 2026
American Medical Response of Inland Empire v. County of San Bernardino
Trial court erroneously enjoined County's award of emergency services contract, where the decision was quasi-legislative and discretionary, not ministerial. 		Municipal Law, Government 4DCA/1 Jan. 7, 2026
Modification: Sierra Pacific Industries Wage and Hour Cases
Defendant-employer waived the right to compel arbitration after engaging in extensive discovery and refusing to identify employees who signed arbitration agreements, despite court order instructing it to do so. 		Arbitration, Employment Law 3DCA Jan. 7, 2026
Nevada Resort Association-International Alliance v. JB Viva Vegas
Musical production company was not liable for withdrawal from multiemployer pension plan because the majority of its employees performed at least some entertainment work, meeting the entertainment industry exemption. 		ERISA 9th Jan. 7, 2026
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima, WA v. Brown
Christian organization seeking to enjoin enforcement of anti-discrimination law was likely to succeed on the merits because practice of hiring co-religionists for non-ministerial roles was shielded by church autonomy doctrine. 		Constitutional Law 9th Jan. 7, 2026
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.