| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B345843
|
Marriage of Strong
Ex-husband's copyright in Michael Jackson collaboration was subject to monetization in order to satisfy over $2 million in delinquent support obligations. |
Remedies, Copyright |
|
F. Rothschild | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
B322752B
|
People v. The North River Ins. Co. (Bad Boys Bail Bonds)
Because appearance periods may be extended for good cause, trial court had authority to grant a good-cause continuance allowing prosecutors to decide whether to extradite fugitive. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
23-2522
|
Gessele v. Jack in the Box Inc.
Where competing factual inferences existed as to whether employer Jack in the Box's overdeductions for state benefits fund was willful, district court's granting of summary judgment on that issue was improper. |
Employment Law |
|
M. Smith | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
D084130
|
Dennis v. Monsanto Co.
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act did not preempt plaintiff's state-law claim that Monsanto failed to warn consumers about pesticide dangers. |
Consumer Law |
|
J. Kelety | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
A172274
|
Deol v. Cal. Veterinary Medical Bd.
Statute authorizing discipline for veterinarians in cases of unprofessional conduct covers more than just substance abuse. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
V. Rodriguez | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
F088720M
|
Modification: Kings County Farm Bureau v. State Water Resources Control Bd.
Remand was appropriate for trial court to reconsider its weighing of relative harm caused by preliminary injunction where its analysis of likelihood of success on the merits was flawed. |
Water Rights |
|
B. Hill | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
B332405M
|
Modification: People v. Cervantes
Trial court had inherent authority to correct unauthorized sentence and erred in ruling it lacked jurisdiction to do so. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Gilbert | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
F088909M
|
Modification: State Water Resources Control Bd. v. Superior Court (Kings County Farm Bureau)
Pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, State Water Resources Board actions in designating a probationary basin and implementing related procedures were exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act. |
Water Rights |
|
B. Hill | Nov. 26, 2025 |
|
24-7536
|
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2025 | ||
|
B344575
|
County of Los Angeles v. Lugo
Trial court err by denying plaintiff's request to set aside a Voluntary Declaration of Paternity for fraud as untimely, where the declaration was executed before statutory amendment shortening filing deadline. |
Family Law |
|
M. Kim | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
B344378
|
Roe v. Smith
Defamation plaintiffs suing for events that occurred when they were minors could not proceed pseudonymously where no overriding interest overcame the public's right of access to court records. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Richardson | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
A172224
|
People v. Murphy
Trial court erred by relying on defendant's nonpayment of restitution fine when denying her request for expungement and reduction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
V. Rodriguez | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
A171659
|
Lorenzo v. San Francisco Zen Center
Despite being a Zen Buddhist minister, former employee's wage-and-hour claims were not barred by First Amendment's Religious Clauses' ministerial exception. |
Employment Law, Constitutional Law |
|
D. Chou | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
A172205
|
Sproul v. Vallee
Trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint to more clearly allege their negligent misrepresentation claim. |
Torts, Civil Procedure |
|
A. Tucher | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
23-3757
|
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland
$7.3 million civil compensatory sanction for pyramid schemers' contumacious violations of consumer protection laws was proper. |
Consumer Law |
|
J. Lefkow | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
25-52
|
Clark v. Sweeney
Fourth Circuit transgressed the party-presentation principle by granting relief on a claim that the habeas petitioner never asserted and that the state never had the chance to address. |
Habeas Corpus |
|
P. Curiam (USSC) | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
24-1159
|
Pitts v. Mississippi
Sixth Amendment's face-to-face confrontation right required case-specific findings that screening child witness from defendant in sexual assault case was necessary despite state statute mandating screens in such cases. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (USSC) | Nov. 25, 2025 |
|
24-1078
|
Beck v. U.S.
Order |
|
Nov. 25, 2025 | ||
|
B339113
|
Onetaste Incorporated v. Netflix, Inc.
Wellness company failed its anti-SLAPP burden to show that Netflix published defamatory statements in its cult documentary. |
Anti-SLAPP, Torts |
|
R. Adams | Nov. 24, 2025 |
|
G063372
|
Park v. Guisti
Because courts must ensure that all litigants have their day in court, trial court abused its discretion in not ensuring that incarcerated plaintiff had meaningful access to court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
J. Bancroft | Nov. 24, 2025 |
|
A170666
|
Gilliland v. City of Pleasanton
Trial court applied an incorrect legal standard in finding that vehicle collision occurred during a qualifying police "pursuit," which would immunize the city from liability. |
Torts, Immunity |
|
J. Humes | Nov. 21, 2025 |
|
A173001
|
Dobarro v. Kim
Appellate court issued attorneys a stark and pointed reminder not to ignore binding precedent when forging their legal arguments in case involving missing a statutory deadline. |
Attorneys, Employment Law |
|
G. Burns | Nov. 21, 2025 |
|
B339729
|
Brown v. Dave & Buster's of California
Settlement of previously-filed Private Attorney General Act action that had been amended to include encompass all claims asserted in subsequent, separate PAGA suit triggered claim preclusion for the second suit. |
Employment Law, Civil Procedure |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 21, 2025 |
|
25-6268
|
State of Oregon v. Trump
Order |
|
Nov. 21, 2025 | ||
|
23-16074
|
Camacho v. Northern Mariana Islands Settlement Fund
Under Northern Mariana Islands law, because cost-of-living allowances are not mandatory, retiree was not entitled to those benefits despite settlement agreement's "Full Benefits" designation. |
Constitutional Law |
|
S. Graber | Nov. 21, 2025 |
|
B337830
|
Mora v. C.E. Enterprises
Because employer's hourly compensation system independently met minimum hourly wage requirements without tacking on bonus pay, it did not violate *Gonzalez*'s "no borrowing" rule. |
Employment Law |
|
K. Yegan | Nov. 20, 2025 |
|
A172568
|
Snover v. Gupta
Trial court properly reduced jury award by calculating defendant's 15-percent fault after applying $250,000 MICRA cap. |
Torts, Remedies |
|
J. Goldman | Nov. 20, 2025 |
|
D084833
|
Anton's Services v. Hagen
Subcontractor for city project was liable for liquidated damages because contractor's withholding of funds did not constitute payment of wages that the subcontractor failed to pay to its employees. |
Employment Law, Municipal Law |
|
M. Buchanan | Nov. 20, 2025 |
|
E083744
|
Schlichter v. Kennedy
Order |
|
Nov. 19, 2025 | ||
|
B330338
|
Pruchnik v. JCCP4621 Common Benefit Committee
Plaintiff failed to meet his burden to prove exemption from eight-percent common benefit work product assessment imposed by court on all plaintiffs in the coordinated proceedings. |
Attorneys |
|
N. Stone | Nov. 19, 2025 |
