This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Matelsky v. Gunn
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
U.S. v. Miles
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Ahlden v. Snider
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
In re Winkle
Colorado exemption statute doesn't preclude debtor from claiming tools of trade exemption for motor vehicles.
Bankruptcy Jul. 31, 2001
Rupp v. Phillips
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
U.S. v. McKinney
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Hagood-New Mexico Trust No. 1 v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Randall v. State of Oklahoma
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Mitchell v. Hawpe Contruction, Inc.
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
U.S. v. Gill
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
In re Wise
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Adkins v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 7,
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
U.S. v. Chavira-Montes
Order
Jul. 31, 2001
Thompson v. Superior Court (People)
California law does not require proof of prior three strikes convictions at preliminary hearing.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 31, 2001
Wal-Mart Stores v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Request for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law must be received within 15 days of the summary order's date.
Workers' Compensation Jul. 31, 2001
Estate of Moring
Reasonable attorney fees may be paid out of trusts created for Medicaid purposes.
Probate and Trusts Jul. 30, 2001
De La Rosa v. Western Funding, Inc.
Assignee of consumer credit sale is entitled to charge 21% interest under Uniform Consumer Credit Code.
Business Law Jul. 30, 2001
People v. Gay
Statements of defendant must be voluntary to be used even for impeachment purposes.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 30, 2001
Davidson v. The Committee for Gail Schoettler
Case concerning violation of former Fair Campaign Act is moot because Act is no longer in force.
Civil Procedure Jul. 30, 2001
Montenegro v. Diaz
When child custody previously decided is up for reconsideration, courts must use a 'changed circumstances' analysis to modify custody.
Family Law Jul. 30, 2001
Hamilton v. Lake Fork Cove Alliance, Inc.
Personal representative has fiduciary duty to all decedent's potential successors.
Probate and Trusts Jul. 30, 2001
People v. Denser
Order
Jul. 29, 2001
Montenegro v. Diaz
Order
Jul. 29, 2001
People v. Martinez
Advisement of prospective jurors of possible death penalty did not deprive defendant of fair and impartial trial.Colorado Court of Appeals.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 29, 2001
Kitsap County v. Moore
Indigent defendants who appeal from limited jurisdictions to superior courts are not entitled to attorney fees.
Government Jul. 29, 2001
State v. Lopez
Because defense counsel didn't challenge state's failure to prove defendant had previous serious conviction, defendant's unlawful possession of firearm conviction is reversed.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 29, 2001
State v. Reynolds
Defendant failed to prove involuntarily abandonment of property where he did not show substantial nexus between abandonment and alleged illegal police conduct.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 29, 2001
State v. Marshall
Where defendant moves to withdraw guilty plea with evidence that he was incompetent, court must either grant motion or convene competency hearing.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 29, 2001
In re Antonio Arredondo on Habeas Corpus
Order
Jul. 27, 2001
Phillips and Associates Family Law Offices, P.C. v. Napolitano
District court lacks jurisidiction to review state court's ruling when appellant's federal constitutional claims are inextricably intertwined with state court decision.
Civil Procedure Jul. 25, 2001