| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00-1040
|
Wells v. City and County of Denver
Private group is not entitled to place message on city government's holiday display. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | |
|
00-3354
|
U.S. v. Ruelas
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
01-2064
|
U.S. v. Marquez-Ramos
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
01-6060
|
Hill v. State of Oklahoma
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
00-9500
|
Barrie v. Federal Aviation Administration
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
00-3377
|
U.S. v. Davis
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
01-1004
|
U.S. v. Nichols
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
00CA1754
|
Tait v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.
Trial court authorized to increase exemplary damage award based on delaying tactics of party. |
Insurance |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | |
|
00CA1624
|
Pacheco v. Allen
Surviving spouse not required to submit wrongful death claim to binding arbitration. |
Torts |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | |
|
00CA1517
|
Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization Inc. v. Colorado Dept. of Health Care Policy
Trial court's determination that state agency breached contract with HMO supported by factual findings. |
Contracts |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | |
|
01-2032
|
Jaramillo v. Massanari
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
00-9535
|
Mickeviciute v. INS
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
01-6089
|
U.S. v. Gardner
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | ||
|
99SC548
|
Academy of Charter Schools v. Adams County School District No. 12
Charter school is authorized to sue its local school district to enforce service agreements. |
Contracts |
|
Sep. 18, 2001 | |
|
00-2189
|
U.S. v. Gordon K., A Minor
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 applies to juvenile proceedings and does not permit sentence modification based on new information. |
Juveniles |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
01-5036
|
US v. Hailey
Order |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | ||
|
00-3029
|
Shannon v. Graves
Single exposure to sewage by prison inmate does not establish constitutional violation. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-15136
|
Venetian Casino Resort v. Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas
Privately constructed sidewalk accommodating pedestrian traffic is protected by First Amendment as public forum. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-35844
|
Western Surety Co. v. Bank of Southern Oregon
Summary judgment is proper where party failed to provide evidence of representation or falsity to support fraud claim. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-35874
|
Demontiney v. United States
Neither United States nor Indian tribe waives its sovereign immunity in contract dispute with engineer over construction project on tribal land. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-3292
|
U.S. v. James
Denial of discovery on issue of selective prosecution of black crack cocaine dealers was proper because evidence did not show discriminatory effect. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-35755
|
Anchustegui v. Department of Agriculture
Due to failure to follow statutorily-mandated procedures, Forest Service's cancellation of grazing permit is not valid. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
01-70219
|
Castro-Espinosa v. Ashcroft
Order |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | ||
|
98-70934
|
Abovian v. INS
Order |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | ||
|
00-15397
|
Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Assoc.
Order |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | ||
|
99-10478
|
U.S. v. King
Amended opinion |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | ||
|
99-56682
|
Milstein v. Cooley
When certain acts of prosecutors are not done in role as advocates, they are not shielded by absolute immunity. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-35293
|
Eott Energy Operating Limited Partnership v. Winterthur Swiss Insurance Co.
Subject matter jurisdiction in state court is proper after finding that Ireland based insurance company is not 'foreign state'. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
00-35303
|
LaVine v. Blaine School District
School did not violate student's constitutional rights by 'emergency expelling' him after he wrote poem about murder and suicide. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 | |
|
99-10282
|
U.S. v. Abonce-Barrera
Translated version of undercover tape recordings are admissible because defendant had opportunity to review tapes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 17, 2001 |
