| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-3284
|
U.S. v. Hardwell
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-6301
|
Bedford v. Oklahoma
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1412
|
U.S. v. Enman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-8103
|
U.S. v. Tobler
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-2334
|
Smith v. Attorney General for State of New Mexico
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
00-1020
|
Crosby v. Neet
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1328
|
U.S. v. Durfee
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-3312
|
U.S. v. Wells
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-2329
|
U.S. v. Smith
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-4189
|
U.S. v. Vizcarra
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1486
|
Bell v. Herrerea
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-0582
|
Graville v. Dodge
Visitation order appointing doctor to supervise compliance and provide therapeutic intervention is not vague or ambiguous. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-0068
|
Kaibab Indus. v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
Successive-injury doctrine does not apply when employee's current industrial injury is exacerbation of prior industrial injury. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-0084
|
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Dougherty (Estate of Ladewig)
Taxpayers must individually exhaust administrative remedies before they can become members of class action seeking tax refund. |
Taxation |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1043
|
Jones v. Mckitterick
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-5155
|
Robinson v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
98-8076
|
Douglas v. Orkin Exterminating Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-5132
|
Johnston v. Volunteers of America Inc.
Domestic service providers that live in residences maintained by provider, rather than in private homes, do not qualify for FLSA overtime exemption. |
Labor Law |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
00-7012
|
West v. Grubbs
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-3251
|
Rhoten v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
00-7007
|
Murray v. The City of Tahlequah
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-7120
|
U.S. v. Dority
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-2294
|
Williamson v. U.S.
Order |
Taxation |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-7152
|
U.S. v. Richardson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-1592
|
Negron v. Ray
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-6207
|
Fuller v. Champion
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-3320
|
U.S. v. Sanders
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
99-6347
|
U.S. v. Chancey
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
00-9513
|
Torres-Juarez v. INS
Order |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
|
98-15574
|
Arnett v. California Public Employees Retirement System
Order |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 |