| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-5138
|
Pride v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
00-3044
|
U.S. v. Hill
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
00-1027
|
Merritt v. United States Parole Commission
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-0377
|
Julio L., a Minor
Juvenile's improper and abusive behavior at school does not amount to disorderly conduct under Penal Code. |
Juveniles |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-0146
|
Martinez v. Binsfield
Civil actions subject to mandatory court annexed arbitration are subject to time deadlines imposed by superior court's uniform practice rules. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-1340
|
U.S. v. Hinton
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-6291
|
United States v. Vance
Order |
Taxation |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-1121
|
Stewart v. Rogerson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-8108
|
Bird v. Everett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
00-5000
|
Jackson v. Gibson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-6378
|
U.S. v. Estupinan
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99SC302
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority v. The 455 Co.
Highway Expansion Fee is not adequate basis for precluding all evidence of special benefits at condemnation proceedings. |
Real Property |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
98SC547
|
Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture
Because rent control is issue of mixed concern, state prohibition supersedes local ordinance. |
Real Property |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-2268
|
Garcia v. Tansy
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
00-3031
|
Zimmer v. McKune
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
00-1076
|
Gray v. Zavaras
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-3260
|
U.S. v. Zugg
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-4194
|
U.S. v. Devoy
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2000 | |
|
99-7109
|
Nash v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 6, 2000 | |
|
98-8112
|
U.S. v. Marroquin
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-3334
|
U.S. v. Maldonado
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2000 | |
|
99-15467
|
U.S. v. Johnson
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
S087627
|
Miner v. City of Los Angeles
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
S086386
|
Low v. County of Los Angeles
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
S087877
|
Sanchez v. Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
B137690
|
Provost v. Superior Court (AETNA U.S. Healthcare Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
S087351
|
Wilner v. Sunset Life Insurance Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
99-1560
|
International Precious Metals Corp. v. Waters
Order |
|
Jun. 5, 2000 | ||
|
98-15003
|
Saracho v. Custom Food Machinery Inc.
Authority-to-sue challenge must be timely made. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2000 | |
|
98-50347
|
U.S. v. Lombera-Camorlinga
Foreigner's post-arrest statements are admissable in criminal prosecution even though he made them before being advised of right to consular notification. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2000 |