This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Visa Inc. v. Stoumbos
Whether allegations that members of a business association agreed to adhere to the association's rules and possess governance rights in the association, without more, are sufficient to plead the element of conspiracy in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as the Court of Appeals held below, or are insufficient, as the Third, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits have held.
Jun. 29, 2016
Harns v. North Dakota
Order
Jun. 29, 2016
Wojahn v. Levi
Order
Jun. 29, 2016
Bank of America Corp. v. Miami, FL
By limiting suit to "aggrieved person[s]," did Congress require that an Fair Housing Act plaintiff plead more than just Article III injury-in-fact? Does proximate cause under the FHA require more than just the possibility that a defendant could have foreseen that the remote plaintiff might ultimately lose money through some theoretical chain of contingencies?
Jun. 29, 2016
Wells Fargo & Co. v. Miami, FL
By limiting suit to "aggrieved person[s]," did Congress require that an Fair Housing Act plaintiff plead more than just Article III injury-in-fact? Does proximate cause under the FHA require more than just the possibility that a defendant could have foreseen that the remote plaintiff might ultimately lose money through some theoretical chain of contingencies?
Jun. 29, 2016
Lynch v. Morales-Santana
Whether Congress's decision to impose a different physical-presence requirement on unwed citizen mothers of foreign-born children than on other citizen parents of foreign-born children violates equal protection. Whether the court of appeals erred in conferring U.S. citizenship on respondent, in the absence of any express statutory authority to do so.
Jun. 29, 2016
U.S. v. Lindsey
In mortgage fraud cases, lender negligence in verifying loan application information or intentional disregard of such information is no defense and evidence of such is inadmissible as a defense.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2016
U.S. v. Lemus
Comparison of drugs that were not tied to defendant is insufficient to support jury's quantity finding, warranting reversal and remand for resentencing.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2016
People v. Bollaert
Convictions of operator of Web site allowing users to post private, intimate photographs of others upheld.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2016
People v. Romo
Closing argument statement regarding presumption of innocence not prosecutorial misconduct as language does not reverse presumption of innocence.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2016
George F., a Minor
Electronics use and search conditions over juvenile sex offender does not violate 'Lent' and is not unconstitutionally overbroad.
Juveniles Jun. 29, 2016
Brodeur v. Atlas Entertainment Inc.
Anti-SLAPP motion in 'American Hustle' case prevails as popularity of microwaves during 1970s constitutes matter of 'public interest.'
Civil Procedure Jun. 28, 2016
Paslay v. State Farm General Insurance Co.
Homeowners may maintain breach of insurance contract action against insurer for unpaid policy benefits in connection with water damage to their home.
Insurance Jun. 28, 2016
Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne Int'l
Whether the pleading standard for alleging that a case falls within the FSIA's expropriation exception is more demanding than the standard for pleading jurisdiction under the federalquestion statute, which allows a jurisdictional dismissal only if the federal claim is wholly insubstantial and frivolous.
Jun. 28, 2016
People v. Jefferson
Court should not have imposed drug program fee, which it then suspended, for defendant who did not have ability pay it.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 28, 2016
Washburn v. North Dakota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Beylund v. North Dakota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Baxter v. North Dakota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Wall v. Stanek
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Kordonowy v. North Dakota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Hexom v. Minnesota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Sharbutt v. Vasquez
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Patrie v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Goodwin v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Diaz-Morales v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Castro-Martinez v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Bryant v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Guevara v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Sanders v. U.S.
Order
Jun. 28, 2016
Garza v. Minnesota
Order
Jun. 28, 2016