This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

self-study / Constitutional Law

The Constitution and robocalls

Miller howard1

Howard B. Miller

U Chicago Law School

Howard is a contributing editor and podcast host at the Daily Journal. He is a JAMS mediator and arbitrator, a past president of the State Bar of California, and a former professor of law at the USC Gould School of Law.

Newman stephen web

Stephen J. Newman

Partner, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Email: snewman@stroock.com

Univ of Chicago Law School; Chicago IL

audio

Podcast host Howard Miller interviews Stephen Newman of Stroock about the impact on robocalls and jurisprudence of recent U.S. Supreme Court case Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants.

#703


Related Tests for Constitutional law

self-study/Constitutional Law

The US Supreme Court saves DACA

By Howard B. Miller, Mark D. Rosenbaum

self-study/Constitutional Law

Understanding the contract clause of the US Constitution

By Gary Ganchrow

self-study/Constitutional Law

The eminent domain process

By Neli N. Palma

participatory/Constitutional Law

When is lethal force 'necessary'?


self-study/Constitutional Law

Eminent domain process: Precondemnation to prejudgment possession

By Neli N. Palma

participatory/Constitutional Law

Eighth Says 'Enough?'


self-study/Constitutional Law

What the high court said in OT ’17

By James Azadian, David Boyadzhyan