This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judicial Profile

For Judge Danielle Colón O'Sullivan, being heard became a calling

Danielle Colon O'Sullivan
Los Angeles County Superior Court

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2026-01-08

MCLE

What California's plastic bag ban reveals about regulating waste by material type

Jan. 8, 2026

California's 2026 carryout bag law closes the thick plast...

By Roberto Escobar

Court of Appeal restores sanity to workers' comp treatment authorizations

Dec. 19, 2025

A new Second District Court of Appeal decision dismantles...

By Brent Daub, Glenn Olsen

AI defamation suits test anti-SLAPP shields and speaker rights

Dec. 12, 2025

As AI-driven defamation suits emerge, courts must not onl...

By Lan P. Vu


Today's News

Judges and Judiciary


Federal prosecutors say Orange County Superior Court Judge Israel Claustro defrauded California's workers' compensation system by secretly operating a medica...


Judges and Judiciary


AB 1544 follows incidents in which journalists were barred from immigration court proceedings, raising questions about state authority over federal courts.


Antitrust & Trade Reg.


The dispute centers on whether states may probe alleged lobbying and corruption as part of a Tunney Act review of the $14 billion deal.


Before his arraignment, Nick Reiner's private defense counsel withdrew, and he is now represented by a public defender in the double-murder case.


Civil Litigation


Ford's amended civil RICO complaint alleging fabricated lemon law billing narrows defendants to three Knight Law Group attorneys.


A federal judge ordered Los Angeles to pay $1.8 million in attorney fees, faulting the city for failing to provide accurate homelessness data and comply with...


Columns

Criminal

Twenty years in California's criminal courts reveal a clear pattern: The system doesn't need radical overhaul--it needs practi...


Mergers & Acquisitions, Entertainment & Sports

Netflix's $72 billion bid for Warner Bros. Discovery tests the limits of antitrust enforcement in the streaming era--and revea...


Health Care & Hospital Law

The Trump administration is already deploying GenAI to second‑guess physicians' determinations of medical necessity for senior...



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Terina Renee Locke, individ... $270,000
Auto v. Auto Telesia Telsee v. City of C... $125,000
Wage and Hour Demetrius Watson, individu... $120,000
Auto v. Bicycle Bryn Miller v. City and Cou... $95,000
Damena Page v. City and Cou... $75,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Theodore Franzone v. City a... $75,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Martine Aniel v. City and C... $45,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Theodore Pitts, minor daugh... $24,245,911
Wrongful Termination DaRon Benson v. Service Cor... $13,655,263
Auto v. Motorcycle John Doe v. Roe Corporation... $4,725,000

On the Move

K&L Gates

Jan. 7, 2026


Zachary Timm was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Timm focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation, labor and employment related litigation, business litigation, and class action defense. He has represented public and private companies in litigation involving claims for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, wage and hour violations, breach of contract, false advertising, unfair competition, and fraud.


Neil A. Eddington was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Eddington handles a wide range of employment-related cases; he is most often called upon to leverage his experience in litigating and advising on wage and hour issues. Eddington oversees single plaintiff and collective actions (class action and PAGA claims) alleging wage and hour violations, including regular rate of pay, overtime, and meal and rest break issues, among others.


Details

K&L Gates has 2000 attorneys in 45 offices including Los Angeles, Orange County, Palo Alto and San Francisco. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, and Intellectual Property. The firm’s website is klgates.com/

Featured Content


Community News

Los Angeles Superior Court launched Court Commons, a mobile exhibition offering legal education, resources for self-represente...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Real Property

Ruffier v. Volcano Hills Road Maintenance Assn.

Despite trial court's conclusion that homeowners association's $200 annual assessment cap was unreasonable, association's failure to follow statutory requirements to increase assessment r...


Employment Law

Spilman v. The Salvation Army

Court of Appeal devised a two-part test to distinguish between employees and volunteers of non-profit organizations.


Evidence

U.S. v. Ruiz

District court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of defendant's prior conviction where it satisfied each prong for admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b).


Eminent Domain

Mendocino Railway v. Meyer

Trial court erred in finding that Mendocino Railway was not a common carrier public utility, entitled to eminent domain.


Municipal Law, Government

American Medical Response of Inland Empire v. County of San Bernardino

Trial court erroneously enjoined County's award of emergency services contract, where the decision was quasi-legislative and discretionary, not ministerial.