This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Special Reports

CLAY Awards 2026

May 6, 2026

2026-05-06

MCLE

From busy to billable: Time management strategies for business-generating lawyers

Apr. 30, 2026

For many lawyers, the tension between billable work and b...

By George Brandon

Criminal relevance fundamentals

Apr. 27, 2026

This article explains how courts determine the relevance ...

By Elia V. Pirozzi

When the bench has a memory: Prosecutors, the RJA and the limits of neutrality

Apr. 22, 2026

A recent California appellate decision confronts a questi...

By K. Chike Odiwe


Today's News

District Attorney Nathan Hochman and the L.A. Police Protection League endorsed John McKinney, a county prosecutor, for Los Angeles city attorney in the June...


Greg Brockman told jurors Musk rejected proposals that would limit his authority over the company.


Consumer Protection Law


Consumers who purchased certain iPhone 15 and 16 models could receive up to $95 under a proposed class action settlement over Siri AI features.


U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II ruled that plaintiff Williene Jackson-Jones failed to meet the requirements for class certification after the 9th U.S. ...


Lawsuits, state enforcement and federal interest are raising questions about insurer conduct and whether California's regulatory system can effectively handl...


Intellectual Property


Testimony in a copyright case against Ye centers on whether he had permission to use disputed music on "Donda," with plaintiffs alleging theft and the defens...


Columns

Civil Procedure

California's landmark jury-bias reform law, Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7, was designed to eliminate discriminatory ju...


Military Law

At least some of the credit may belong to the U.S. military and its veterans.


Neuroethics is rapidly emerging as a critical but underdeveloped field in law and policy, leaving the legal profession unprepa...



Verdicts & Settlements

Consumer Protection United States of America v.... $150,000,000
Breach of Contract Javanni Munguia-Brown, Ange... $43,000,000
ERISA John Baleja, on behalf of h... $21,500,000
Auto v. Bus Sue Thao, by and through hi... $9,550,000
Negligence T.A. v. Los Angeles Unified... $8,000,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Monique Alvarez, et al. v. ... $6,000,000
Wage and Hour Kasper Leuzinger, Michael A... $4,050,000
Wage and Hour Telecia B. Harris, on behal... $2,500,000
Product Liability Alberto Salcedo Maldonado v... $2,325,000
Sexual Harassment U.S. Equal Employment Oppor... $1,490,000

On the Move

Alston & Bird LLP

May 4, 2026


Jennifer A. Golinveaux joined Alston & Bird LLP as a partner in San Francisco and Palo Alto. The move was May 4, 2026.

Golinveaux is an intellectual property litigator representing technology, media, and consumer-brand clients in copyright, trademark, and related disputes. Her work includes defending internet service providers and online platforms in large copyright cases, obtaining rulings under the DMCA safe-harbor provisions, and handling matters involving digital media and online marketplaces. She also works on trademark enforcement, trade dress, false advertising, cybersquatting, and product design litigation, with results including dismissals, injunctions, and appellate decisions. Golinveaux was one of three new partners who joined Alston & Bird's IP Litigation Group. The other two, Michael Elkin and Sean Anderson, are in New York.


Details

Alston & Bird LLP has 935 attorneys in 13 offices including Los Angeles, Century City, Palo Alto, and San Francisco. Among the law firm's key practice areas are Intellectual Property, Corporate & Finance, Litigation & Trial, and Regulatory & Government. The firm’s website is www.alston.com

Featured Content


Community News

The retired federal judge and the Gibson Dunn partner were recognized Wednesday for careers spanning civil rights, high-stakes litigation and access to justice. The event raised funds for the Los Angeles County Library.




Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Berch

Jury was properly instructed on felony false imprisonment based on menace because menace does not require a threat of force greater than reasonably necessary to effectuate the restraint.


Juveniles

In re Parker B.

Welfare and Institutions Code section 782 dismissal erased juvenile findings for sealing purposes but did not eliminate firearm restrictions, which survive dismissals and record sealings.


Evidence, Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Pineda

At petitioner's Penal Code section 1172.6 evidentiary hearing, resentencing court did not err in admitting hearsay evidence that was previously admitted at the preliminary hearing.


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Moss

Courts resentencing under section 1172.75 may reimpose the upper term even if a jury did not find, and the defendant did not stipulate, to the underlying aggravating factors.


Constitutional Law

3Pak LLC v. City of Seattle

Neither the state-created danger doctrine nor the Takings Clause applied to businesses' alleged economic harm resulting from cessation of police services amidst protests.