Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
May 17, 2018
Anti-SLAPP law continues to cause headaches for 9th Circuit
A three-judge panel of the court on Wednesday affirmed U.S. District Judge William Orrick’s denial of a motion to strike and dismiss a fraud and RICO violation lawsuit Planned Parenthood is pursuing against anti-abortion activists who infiltrated and secretly filmed the organization’s conferences.
A California law that allows defendants to escape litigation meant to hinder protected First Amendment activity continues to vex the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the court affirmed U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick's denial of a motion to strike and dismiss a fraud and RICO violation lawsuit Planned Parenthood is pursuing against anti-abortion activists who infiltrated and secretly filme...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Planned Parenthood seeks to hold anti-abortion activists’ attorneys in contempt
By Blaise Scemama
Civil Procedure
Batzel v. Smith
Operator of Internet listserv may be liable for publishing defamatory email sent by third party.
Government
U.S. v. Newsham
Under False Claims Act, Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation statute applies to counterclaims against plaintiff in qui tam action.
