This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judicial Profile

Judge Enrique Guerrero lets attorneys build their record

Enrique Guerrero
San Bernardino County Superior Court

2026-03-06

From The Archive


MCLE

Why good mediation briefs matter

Feb. 13, 2026

A strong mediation brief isn't just paperwork--it sharpen...

By Scott Hengesbach

The power of communication in keeping cases moving and clients happy

Feb. 13, 2026

Cases stall not from law, but from silence. A quick call ...

By Robyn E. Frick

IRS Notice 2025-69: How the new deductions for tips and overtime work in 2025

Feb. 11, 2026

The IRS issued Notice 2025‑69 to guide taxpayers on claim...

By Daniel Chung


Today's News

Elon Musk told a federal jury his tweet pausing the $44 billion Twitter deal was literal and not meant to move markets, as investors claim it was part of a s...


U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim ordered an in-person deposition and warned of "zero tolerance" for delays while partially granting Patagonia's sanctions moti...


LA Fires


A proposed class action alleges Farmers Insurance relied on flawed environmental testing to deny smoke and ash damage claims from the 2025 Eaton Fire, endang...


Ethics/Professional Responsibility


A San Francisco judge denied without prejudice a New York lawyer's pro hac vice application in Aurora Solar's trade secrets case, citing insufficient informa...


Judges and Judiciary


Plaintiff's attorney alleges dental malpractice case was steered by the recused judge to his former law firm partner rather than it being randomly reassigned...


A federal judge signaled approval of Grubhub's $24.75 million settlement with California delivery drivers in a long-running misclassification lawsuit, pendin...


Columns

Stipulations can streamline custody cases, even in domestic violence matters. But as the Court of Appeal reminds us, in Sectio...


Admitting testimony regarding business records

Mar. 6, 2026
By Jay M. Spillane

When contract disputes reach trial, the outcome often turns not just on what was written, but on what was said, intended and p...


Legacies in the law: Celebrating the families who shape our profession

Mar. 6, 2026
By Paul R. Kiesel, Lauren M. Kiesel

"Legacies in the Law" celebrates attorney-parent teams and raises scholarships for first-gen law students--June 25 at the Cali...



Verdicts & Settlements

Unruh Civil Rights Act Allan Candelore, on his own... $60,500,000
Negligence Toriano Byrd, Toni Espinosa... $14,950,200
Auto v. Pedestrian Newcomb v. Wahlund Construc... $13,375,000
Auto v. Auto Kian Logan Riahi v. Ricardo... $7,515,000
Wage and Hour Louis C. Berreyes, individu... $4,880,000
Wrongful Termination Randy Pinnelli v. Community... $4,318,000
Wrongful Termination Lauren Warrem v. San Diego ... $4,181,000
Securities Exchange Act In re Robinhood Order Flow ... $2,000,000
Auto v. Auto Juan Gonzalez Serrano v. LA... $1,982,000
Wage and Hour Edgardo Marquina, Marvin Lo... $1,837,500

On the Move

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Feb. 27, 2026


Daniel Freedman joined Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck as a shareholder in Los Angeles. The move was Feb. 25, 2026.

Freedman advises developers, property owners and project teams on complex land use, environmental and development matters across California. His practice integrates entitlement strategy, CEQA and municipal law counseling, and project-related litigation to advance projects, manage risk and protect long-term development objectives. He represents clients throughout the development process, from initial planning and agency approvals through administrative appeals and litigation. His work also encompasses related real estate and regulatory issues, including municipal law, open government requirements, signage regulations, housing policy, public contracting, and disputes involving land use controls, takings and exactions, inverse condemnation, construction defects, landslides and other property-related claims.


Details

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck has 300 attorneys in 14 offices including Sacramento, LA, Santa Barbara, San Diego. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Government Relations, IP, Real Estate, Natural Resources, Corporate . The firm’s website is https://www.bhfs.com/

Address

2029 Century Park East Suite 950 , Los Angeles CA 90067 USA
T: (310) 500-4600

Featured Content


Community News



Podcasts

Melanie Chaney, firm-wide managing partner of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, on how mid-size firms can innovate without the budget ...


Daily Appellate Report

Fees and Costs, Environmental Law

Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control

Plaintiffs, the non-prevailing party in a CEQA action, were not entitled to attorneys' fees under the "catalyst theory" because a judicial resolution on the merits had been reached.


Evidence

LAOSD Asbestos Cases

Because defendant abandoned a *Kelly* novelty challenge and instead argued reliability, the trial court properly evaluated expert testimony under *Sargon* and did not abuse its discretion...


Administrative Agencies

Harrington v. Housing Authority of Riverside County

Reversal was required where trial court misunderstood the scope of its independent review of Housing Authority's decision to terminate Section 8 benefits.


Immigration

Chairez v. Mayorkas

Because statute commits decision to Secretary of Homeland Security's discretion and statutory language provides only guidance, not a judicially enforceable standard, nonimmigrant U-visa w...


Immigration

Pacito v. Trump

Plaintiffs failed to establish that they were likely to succeed on the merits of their challenges to Executive Order suspending refugee entry under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (US...